Stock photography agency reviewers do a good job of quality control, but sometimes the inconsistency between them drives me crazy.
I can understand that different agencies are looking for different picture styles, but some quality comments leave me totally bamboozled, including:-
I guess it comes back to the old adage that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and everyone sees something different in an image.
This is an interesting lessen in personnel taste, and shows how futile it is to try and design an image that suits everyone.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Well I have been blown away by stock reviewers from yet another stock library.
I recently submitted a group of 10 images to a big name stock library I had not used before. These photos are already carried on a number of other top 5 stock sites and sell regularly, yet none were accepted by this new library… I am left scratching my head.
The reasons given were:-
- “Your image did not meet our technical standards”, and
- “Your image did not reach our desired level of aesthetic quality”.
Sometimes I have trouble understanding what these people are thinking.
I can deal with technical things like out of focus, image size, etc (and check all these in detail before submission)…. but aesthetic quality??? what a load of rubbish… if it sells, it sells.